Good Debt vs Bad Debt: How to Tell Them Apart

    Chris McMorran, Founder of Kala Financial
    Chris McMorran
    Founder, Kala Financial
    April 22, 2026
    7 min read
    The short answer

    Good debt funds something that returns more than the financing costs and fits the cash flow it depends on. Bad debt funds things that do not produce a return, or carries a payment the business cannot comfortably support. The same loan can be either, depending entirely on how it is used.

    Abstract illustration of two diverging financial paths

    Debt has a worse reputation than it deserves. I have spent my career around it, on both sides of the table, and the problem was almost never that an owner borrowed. The problem was what they borrowed for, how it was structured, and whether anyone had run the math before the money showed up.

    Used well, debt is one of the most powerful tools a business has. Used poorly, it is one of the fastest ways to weaken a company from the inside.

    What makes debt good?

    Good debt funds something that returns more than the debt costs. You borrow at a given rate to buy equipment that lifts your capacity, inventory that sells through, or a location that brings in new revenue, and the financing pays for itself and leaves you ahead. That is leverage in the truest sense of the word.

    Good debt also fits the need. A term loan matched to the useful life of the asset it is buying. A line of credit drawn to bridge a timing gap and paid back down as receivables come in. The structure works with your cash flow instead of fighting it.

    What makes debt bad?

    Bad debt funds things that do not produce a return, or it carries a cost the business cannot comfortably support. High-rate financing used to cover ongoing losses. A short, expensive product used to pay for a long-term need. Borrowing stacked on borrowing until debt service eats the cash the business needs just to operate.

    The warning signs are almost always visible ahead of time: a cost of capital higher than the return the money can realistically earn, payments that strain your coverage, or borrowing meant to paper over a problem rather than fund an opportunity.

    What does a tale of two loans look like?

    Picture two owners who each borrow $200,000. Same amount, same good intentions, opposite outcomes. The difference was never the loan. It was what the money was asked to do.

    OwnerUse of fundsOutcome
    Owner AMachine that unlocked turned-away revenueNew revenue covered the payment several times over within a year.
    Owner BCovered payroll through an unending downturnRate climbed, balance lingered, financing bought time the business could not afford.

    What three questions separate them?

    Before you take on any financing, three questions cut through most of the confusion. I have asked them alongside a lot of owners, and they hold up.

    What is this money funding, and will it return more than it costs? If the use does not generate a return above the rate, the math does not work.

    Does the structure fit the need? Short-term tools for short-term needs, longer-term debt for longer-term investments.

    Can the business comfortably service it? Run the coverage. If the payment leaves no cushion, the debt is too heavy regardless of the rate.

    Answer those honestly and you will know, before you sign, which kind of debt you are about to take on.

    Borrow like an owner who has done the math

    The owners I have watched use debt best are not the ones who avoid it. They are the ones who know exactly what each dollar is for and what it is going to return. That clarity is what turns borrowing into a growth tool instead of a quiet liability.

    Frequently asked questions

    Weighing a borrowing decision?

    We help owners structure debt as leverage and avoid the financing that quietly works against them.